Teachers
on child poverty
Earlier this month (April 2018) a survey released by the National Education Union (NEU) and the Child Poverty Action Group showed school staff reporting a significant rise in poverty amongst pupils. 87% of respondents said that poverty was affecting their students’ ability to
learn and 60% noted that the effect of poverty on low-income
school children had worsened since 2015.
“The level of
child poverty teachers and school staff are witnessing on a daily basis is
having a dreadful effect on the life chances and education of far too many
children and young people. It is shocking that in one of the richest countries
in the world we have children without appropriate clothes or shoes, who go
hungry every day, who cannot afford sanitary protection or who have no
stationery to do their homework.…."
"Our Government cannot continue to preside over
such inequality and misery."
Respondents believe that poverty
is damaging children’s education and describe the daily critical situation of
poor pupils as “heartbreaking.” Adding that:
"... children are
turning up at the school gates showing visible signs of poverty, such as grey skin and poor teeth, hair and nails…. pupils putting food in their pockets to
take home because they’re not sure if they’re going to get another meal that day”.
Over half of those surveyed [900
heads, teachers and school support staff, all members of
the NEU] (53%) said that at least once a term they personally provide school equipment such as books and stationery; over a third said they provide food; more than a fifth are supplying PE or sports kit; 14% donate toys and play things; 10% provide sanitary protection; 10% provide other hygiene products; and 8% help with travel costs. With many doing so at least once a week. (above taken from
the NEU] (53%) said that at least once a term they personally provide school equipment such as books and stationery; over a third said they provide food; more than a fifth are supplying PE or sports kit; 14% donate toys and play things; 10% provide sanitary protection; 10% provide other hygiene products; and 8% help with travel costs. With many doing so at least once a week. (above taken from
(NB: see end of this
piece for some extra points on child poverty, government callousness and cuts.)
Teachers on teaching
Also this month in a poll of teachers in England, conducted by the NEU, more than 80% of respondents reported that they have considered leaving the profession over the last year due to heavy workload and long hours. In a similar poll by the country's other main teaching union (NASUWT) 65% of respondents said they had seriously considered leaving teaching over the past 12 months.
And yet:
...tackling
retention may not only be a question of reducing the number of hours that
teachers work. While unmanageable workload is clearly a “push factor”, it’s
worth also reflecting on the “pull factors” – the reasons teachers join the
profession in the first place, and what keeps them there.
The point here is that in addition to issues of workload and home/work life balance the educational experience of pupils and the job-satisfaction of teachers is also important as:
The desire to do everything possible to help young people can make it hard for teachers to switch off…. it’s easy to see how, in a culture of hyper-accountability, this sense of confidence in their own capability might be eroded.
https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2017/nov/16/to-stop-teachers-leaving-the-profession-lets-help-them-make-a-difference
But what do they know?
In response to the clear evidence of the rising amount of unhappiness amongst teachers the government response is:
The point here is that in addition to issues of workload and home/work life balance the educational experience of pupils and the job-satisfaction of teachers is also important as:
The desire to do everything possible to help young people can make it hard for teachers to switch off…. it’s easy to see how, in a culture of hyper-accountability, this sense of confidence in their own capability might be eroded.
https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2017/nov/16/to-stop-teachers-leaving-the-profession-lets-help-them-make-a-difference
But what do they know?
In response to the clear evidence of the rising amount of unhappiness amongst teachers the government response is:
"There are no great schools without great teachers and the record numbers choosing to work in our classrooms shows how desirable career it continues to be."
Not true. For as Hannah Fearn reminded us in 2017:
Early in September 2016 half of places on some teacher training courses sat empty whilst between 2010 and 2015 10,000 left the profession. Furthermore:
Early in September 2016 half of places on some teacher training courses sat empty whilst between 2010 and 2015 10,000 left the profession. Furthermore:
In short, there
simply aren’t enough teachers to educate our young people and it’s a crisis
that is entirely politically manufactured.
Three years ago,
half of teachers said they were considering leaving the profession. At that
point, as well as dealing with a spiralling workload, they were also being
insulted each morning on the radio, in the press or in parliament by the then
Education Secretary Michael Gove. The very man who should have been fighting
their corner in an age of cutbacks instead spent his days inventing some very
creative names for teachers: “the blob”, the “enemies of promise”, “soft
bigots” with “low expectations”.
Fearn continued:
Fearn continued:
Teachers aren’t uniquely sensitive creatures; they are experts in their field and, by voting with their feet and leaving their vocation, they are sending a warning to the Government that something is seriously wrong.
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/teachers-crisis-education-leaving-profession-jobs-market-droves-who-would-be-one-a7591821.html#r3z-addoor
It is not at all surprising that workload pressures along with the emotional distress and financial burdens and pressures resulting from austerity that teachers (and other public sector workers) are having to cope with leads to less people entering and more people leaving the profession. Shockingly, it's also not surprising that those in power are not listening. Not listening to the stresses teachers' are facing; not listening to the evidence of children, and their parents, suffering from food and other poverty; not listening to the stories of more and more children being too hungry to learn. Not surprising because there are many, many other examples of the dismissal of
expertise by the Government and its Ministers. Just a couple of examples here:
Jeremy Hunt has accused Stephen Hawking of a “pernicious” lie after the
physicist said it seemed the Tories were steering the UK towards a US-style
health insurance system. Hours after the health secretary was criticised for
claiming Hawking was wrong in the row about the government’s seven-day NHS plan,
he leapt back into the fray with two tweets defending the Conservative party’s
record on the health service….
In the speech,
Hawking will accuse the health secretary of “cherrypicking” favourable evidence
while suppressing contradictory research to suit his argument.
AND:
The
Government ignored expert advice and made changes in 2015 that made it
easier to buy dangerous acids that have been used in a spate of
attacks in recent weeks…. Changes made in the Deregulation Act 2015 scrapped an
obligation on sellers of dangerous substances, including acids, to be
registered with their local council. The move was opposed by medical experts, who warned that it could make it easier
for criminals to get their hands on highly toxic substances, and by the
Government’s own advisory board on the regulation of hazardous chemicals…..
The changes … were against the recommendations of the
Poisons Board, a panel of experts established to advise ministers on regulating
the trade in dangerous substances, who favoured tightening, rather than
weakening, regulations so that high concentrations of acid could be sold only
by licensed pharmacists.
And perhaps it’s this example that makes clear
the reasons for such dismissal:
… Theresa
May has been criticised for leaving a leadership vacuum at the Social Mobility
Commission, four months after Alan Milburn, its former chair, led a walkout
from the advisory body…. “They are
looking for someone more aligned to the government’s agenda and wary of the
more academic types whose behaviour is harder to predict,” said one former
Tory minister…. https://www.ft.com/content/6685047c-33f8-11e8-ae84-494103e73f7f
OUT OF THE MOUTHS...
OUT OF THE MOUTHS...
****
Some extra evidence (just this month) of child poverty, government
callousness and cuts
As many as
one in eight children stand to lose their entitlement to free school meals
under new eligibility criteria introduced by the government, according to a
leading spending watchdog. The Institute for Fiscal Studies said that although
210,000 children previously ineligible for free meals stand to gain under the
new system, 160,000 pupils who were entitled to free meals under the old system
stand to lose out.…The figures call into question claims made by senior government ministers that no child will lose eligibility for free school meals under the new criteria.
https://schoolsweek.co.uk/160000-children-will-lose-free-school-meals-says-spending-watchdog/
https://schoolsweek.co.uk/160000-children-will-lose-free-school-meals-says-spending-watchdog/
And:
As many as 1,000
Sure Start children’s centres may have been shut down in England since 2010,
double the official closure estimates, leaving the UK’s flagship early years
programme “hollowed out” and in decline, a study has found. According to the
Sutton Trust, an education and social mobility foundation, a lack of clarity in
how individual centres are identified and changes are reported means official
Figures of 500 closures since 2010 are likely to be an underestimate. Funding cuts mean
access to early years provision varies widely across the country, while many
remaining centres offer only a fraction of the services they once did, the
trust says, hampering social mobility and resulting in thousands of children
missing out on vital services.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/apr/05/1000-sure-start-childrens-centres-may-have-shut-since-2010
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/apr/05/1000-sure-start-childrens-centres-may-have-shut-since-2010
With reference to all of the above:
@AngelaRayner: Shocking "double whammy" attack
on families by the Tories has been laid bare. Up to 160,000 children from
poorer families losing free school meals eligibility. We have 1,000 sure start
centre closures, more than double what the government has stated. Tories are
failing families. (4th April 2018)
I have written about such issues previously also. See for example:
http://arwenackcerebrals.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/hungry-children-responses-from-left-and.html
http://arwenackcerebrals.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/childhood-memories-food-poverty-and.html
I have written about such issues previously also. See for example:
http://arwenackcerebrals.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/hungry-children-responses-from-left-and.html
http://arwenackcerebrals.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/childhood-memories-food-poverty-and.html
No comments:
Post a Comment